Begriffliche Situationsanalyse aus Videodaten bei unvollständiger und fehlerhafter Information

Diese Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der automatischen Erkennung komplexer Situationen in Bildfolgen im Videoüberwachungskontext. Bei der Behandlung von Daten aus natürlichen Umgebungen ergeben sich Schwierigkeiten. Diese Arbeit erweitert dazu den verwendeten Formalismus um die Behandlung von Unschärfe, fehlender Information und Komplexität, zeigt die Robustheit der Situationserkennung bei natürlichen Szenarien und stellt die generische Anwendbarkeit auch über Diskursbereichsgrenzen hinaus heraus

Begriffliche Situationsanalyse aus Videodaten bei unvollständiger und fehlerhafter Information

This work addresses the automatic detection of complex situations in image sequences in the video surveillance context. There are difficulties when dealing with data from natural environments. This work expands the formalism of FMTHL and SGTs to deal with erroneous, missing, and noisy data and complexity, demonstrates the robustness of situational recognition in natural scenarios, and expands generic applicability beyond discourse boundaries

What are Hybrid Development Methods Made Of?

Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use customized processes that combine different development methods-so-called hybrid development methods. Even though such hybrid development methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically construct synergetic practices is missing. Based on 1,467 data points from a large-scale online survey among practitioners, we study the current state of practice in process use to answer the question: What are hybrid development methods made of? Our findings reveal that only eight methods and few practices build the core of modern software development. This small set allows for statistically constructing hybrid development methods

What are Hybrid Development Methods Made Of? An Evidence-Based Characterization

Among the multitude of software development processes available, hardly any is used by the book. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use customized processes that combine different development methods— so-called hybrid development methods. Even though such hybrid development methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically construct synergetic practices is missing. In this paper, we make a first step towards devising such guidelines. Grounded in 1,467 data points from a large-scale online survey among practitioners, we study the current state of practice in process use to answer the question: What are hybrid development methods made of? Our findings reveal that only eight methods and few practices build the core of modern software development. This small set allows for statistically constructing hybrid development methods. Using an 85% agreement level in the participants’ selections, we provide two examples illustrating how hybrid development methods are characterized by the practices they are made of. Our evidence-based analysis approach lays the foundation for devising hybrid development methods